|
Headline:
The second "Denmark study". The conclusions appear to be based on
lost data. SafeMinds re-ran their numbers, and found that autism rates
and thimerosal levels were actually highly correlated.
Actual Question This Study Asked & Answered:
Q: Did the discontinuation of thimerosal use in vaccines in Denmark lead to a decrease in autism?
A: No.
Did the study look at unvaccinated children?
No.
Conflict of Interest (from the study itself):
"Author Affiliations: Danish Epidemiology Science Centre,Department
of Epidemiology Research (Messrs Hviid, Wohlfahrt, and Dr Melbye) and
Medical Department (Dr Stellfeld), Statens Serum Institut [a vaccine
manufacturer], Copenhagen, Denmark."
Ability to Generalize:
None. As SafeMinds noted:
"A large percentage of diagnosed autism cases are lost from the
Danish registry each year. In the ten years preceding 2000, 815 cases
were lost, more than the 710 remaining in the registry in 2000. The vast
majority of those lost cases would represent older children in the 2000
registry. Since the relative risk of the Hviid study is based on
finding fewer older thimerosal-exposed children than younger unexposed
children, the validity of their conclusion exonerating thimerosal in
autism is questionable. More likely, the finding is a result of missing
records rather than true lower incidence rates among the exposed group."
Post-Publication Criticism:
Very high.
Scoring (Out of 40 possible points):
Asked the Right Question: 0
Ability to Generalize: 0
Conflict of Interest: 0
Post-Publication Criticism: 1
Total Score: 1
Choice Excerpt from the Study:
"As shown in Figure 2, the incidence of autism diagnosed among
Swedish inpatients aged 2 to 10 years old began to increase in the mid
to late 1980s, rising from a rate of 5 to 6 inpatient-diagnosed cases
per 100,000 person-years before 1985 to a peak rate of 9.2/100,000 in
1993."
Meaning:
The authors are saying that Sweden has an autism rate of 1 in 10,000,
which is SIXTY times lower than the U.S. rate of 1 in 150, which the
authors don’t appear to consider or discuss. Isn’t anyone curious why
Sweden’s autism rate is SIXTY times lower that ours?
Guest Critic #1: SafeMinds
Safe Minds Analysis of Denmark Data Finds Dramatic Drop in
Autism Rates After Thimerosal Removal from Vaccines, Finds Flaw in Study
Appearing in JAMA, Invalidating its Conclusions
Analysis provides further substantiation of role of thimerosal in
autism, sheds more light on vaccine conflicts of interest A newly
released analysis of autism registry data from Denmark by Safe Minds, a
non-profit autism organization, shows that the rate of autism declined
from an incidence of 1 in 500 prior to 1992 to 1 in 1,500 today. This
decline in the incidence of autism follows the removal of thimerosal
from infant vaccines in that country in 1992. The analysis also
uncovered a flaw in the methodology of Danish investigators publishing
in the October issue of JAMA (Hviid et al), who utilized the same Danish
registry data and concluded that autism rates in Denmark rose after
thimerosal removal from vaccines.
"In our review of the Danish data we identified a flaw which resulted
in a substantial loss of autism case records from the registry which
essentially renders the findings from the JAMA study by Hviid and
colleagues invalid", said Sallie Bernard, executive director of Safe
Minds. "The registry allows 10-25% of diagnosed autism cases to be lost
from its records each year. The effect of this loss is such that the
records will disappear from older age groups to a much greater degree
than from younger age groups in any given registry year."
The Hviid findings are based on finding fewer older children in their
2000 registry cohort than younger ones. Since the older children
received thimerosal vaccines and the younger ones did not, Hviid falsely
concluded that thimerosal is not a factor in autism. The Safe Minds
analysis shows instead that the decline is likely due to the loss of
records of older children from the registry records, rather than a true
decline in autism rates in the older group.
Safe Minds reanalyzed the Denmark registry data and used an
alternative method to avoid the record removal bias. The analysis looked
at same-age children - 5-9 year olds - but from different registry
years: 1992, when all of the children received thimerosal-containing
vaccines, and 2002, when none of the children received vaccines with
thimerosal. After adjusting for the lack of outpatient records in the
1992 registry, the analysis found a 2.3 higher number of autism cases
among the 1992 thimerosal-exposed group relative to the 2002 non-exposed
group.
The analysis then determined an autism incidence rate for the
non-thimerosal group of 1 in 1,500, while the thimerosal-exposed group
had an incidence of 1 in 500, a 3-fold increase. The higher figure is
comparable to the 1 in 500 incidence level for core autism recently
found in England and the 1 in 250 incidence level recently calculated
for the US. The thimerosal exposure level and timing in pre-1992 Denmark
was comparable to that in England, while that for the US was somewhat
more aggressive.
The Safe Minds analysis also revealed how small shifts in study
design using the Denmark data can result in large changes to the
results. The volatility stems from the many changes that the data set
has gone through in the past decade. This makes the data set especially
prone to possible bias.
"In the Hviid study in JAMA we can clearly see how the data was
misinterpreted so a conclusion could be drawn to clear thimerosal from
any role in autism," said Lyn Redwood, president of Safe Minds. "This
misinterpretation is not surprising given the authors' employment with
the manufacturer and promoter of vaccines in Denmark, Statens Serum
Institut. This conflict of interest should have been stated by JAMA."
Safe Minds is calling for a complete analysis of the Denmark autism
registry data set by independent, unbiased epidemiologists who have no
involvement in vaccine development, production, promotion, or
administration.
Click HERE fo Safe Minds analysis.
Guest Critic #2: Bernard Rimland, Autism Research Institute
To the Editor: In their article on the association
between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, Dr Hviid and
colleagues1 acknowledged their affiliations with Statens Serum Institut,
Copenhagen, Denmark, but did not disclose that the institute is a
for-profit, state-owned enterprise with roughly $120 million in annual
revenue. According to its 2002 Annual Report,2 vaccines represent
approximately one half of Statens Serum Institut's revenues and more
than 80% of its profits. Furthermore, Statens Serum Institut
manufactured the now discontinued monocomponent pertussis vaccine that
contained thimerosal under investigation in their study. They were also
the providers of diphtheria and tetanus components of a major
thimerosal-containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular
pertussis vaccine (DTaP) vaccine sold in the United States.3
Bernard Rimland, PhD
Autism Research Institute
San Diego, Calif
|